Solution:
1. LNG Storage Tanks and Auxiliary Equipment
2. LNG Transmission Pipeline System
3. LNG gasification stations and terminal equipment
Customer review:
From John Miller, Engineering Manager at a Coastal LNG Receiving Terminal
"We selected low-temperature glass wool for the insulation of our LNG tank accessories, pipe elbows, and valve assemblies, and it has exceeded our expectations. The biggest advantage is its flexibility—unlike rigid insulation materials like foam glass, it can be easily cut and wrapped around irregular components, ensuring no insulation dead spots. At -162℃, it maintains stable thermal performance without embrittlement or deformation, and the Class A fire resistance gives us extra peace of mind in our explosion-proof zone. The insulation system has been in operation for 2 years now, with no signs of cold bridge formation or insulation degradation. Highly recommend it for LNG projects dealing with complex structural insulation needs."
From Sarah Chen, Operations Director at an Urban LNG Regasification Station
"For our regasification unit’s outlet pipelines and BOG compressor room insulation, low-temperature glass wool was a game-changer. Its ability to withstand the temperature gradient between -162℃ (LNG side) and ambient temperature (natural gas side) solved our long-standing issue of condensation on pipeline exteriors. What’s more, its vibration resistance is impressive—our BOG compressors run 24/7, but the glass wool insulation layer has never cracked due to equipment vibration, which cuts down our maintenance workload significantly. Compared to polyurethane composite panels, it also helped us reduce insulation material costs by about 18%, while the construction efficiency was 30% higher. It’s a cost-effective and reliable choice for LNG terminal operations."
From Michael Torres, Procurement Supervisor at a Cross-Border LNG Pipeline Project
"Cost control and construction speed were top priorities for our 120km LNG transmission pipeline project, and low-temperature glass wool checked both boxes. First, its price is more competitive than foam glass—we saved roughly 15% on the total insulation budget. Second, its on-site adaptability is unmatched: the team could cut and install it directly on-site without complex molds, which shortened the pipeline insulation schedule by nearly a month. Most importantly, it meets the strict low-temperature requirements of LNG (-162℃) with a thermal conductivity of less than 0.030W/(m·K), ensuring minimal cold loss during transmission. We’ve already specified it for our next phase of pipeline expansion."

